Stock Markets Review

Big players get physical with gold

Date: 26 November 2009
Contributed by Euro Pacific Capital

By John Browne

 

Over past years, we at Euro Pacific have taken an increasingly jaundiced view of paper currencies and written repeatedly about gold as an alternative. Along the way, we have urged investors to consider both the security and physical accessibility of their gold investments, and have advocated for at least some holdings to be in physical form. There are those who may have felt our views were overly cautious, even alarmist. Now, however, it is increasingly clear that major investors, including even central banks, are following our advice. Meanwhile, we continue to set the curve by calling for an even greater share of investors' portfolios to be in physical bullion or secure equivalents.


Despite the trials Western economies have already experienced, worse economic times still lie ahead. The current administration appears unable to accept the pain of deleveraging and has instead set upon a course of limitless public-sector spending, financed by increased taxation, deficits, and the covert debasement of the U.S. dollar. Obama's acolytes haven't acknowledged the threat that their policies could cause the dollar to lose its privileged position as the world's reserve currency, which would devastate the relative value of the U.S. dollar and many paper investments denominated in dollars, including Treasuries. Indeed, it would likely trigger a second financial collapse, this time with accompanying hyperinflation.


To protect their wealth from inflation and financial panic, big players like hedge funds, sovereign wealth funds, and central banks are turning not just to gold, but to physical gold.


Many investors are demanding and prepared to pay for physical delivery. This indicates an intention to remain invested for a significant period of time, removing considerable selling pressure from the market. More concerning, the willingness to finance physical delivery and storage indicates a fundamental decline in the credibility of paper contracts.


For centuries, gold has been the bane of profligate governments. For decades, Western governments, led by the U.S., have sought to demonetize the 'embarrassing' metal. Most recently, the U.S. led other central banks into the secretive Central Bank Gold Agreements (CBGA). These were designed to coordinate, through the IMF, the sale of some 500 metric tonnes of central bank gold into the market each year. The covert aim has been to make gold less attractive by concealing its appreciation and, simultaneously, create maximum price volatility to destroy gold's legitimacy as a monetary instrument.


Since 1980, when gold reached $850 a fine ounce (or some $2,330 in today's debased dollars), the CBGA has been successful at disparaging gold investment. To this day, most Wall Street commentators reflexively opine against gold whenever the conversation turns to it. Displaying staggering ignorance or bias, they cite the lack of interest paid on gold and its storage costs. They ignore completely gold's total return, through capital gain, which is up by over 100 percent in the past five years.


In keeping with the CBGA, it has long been considered taboo for major central banks to be seen buying gold. But the pacts are losing their grip.

 

China, now the world's largest gold producer, has quietly increased its gold holdings by some 75 percent in just 7 years, while remaining a 'loyal' CBGA player. Cleverly, she has sidestepped the unwritten CBGA non-purchase rule by quietly diverting part of her domestic production into the central bank's vaults before it enters the global marketplace.

 

Publicly, China has led international calls for the replacement of the U.S. dollar as the privileged reserve currency by a basket of currencies and gold.

 

Unable to tolerate the continued debasement of their dollar reserves, other developing countries are now taking defensive moves. Earlier this month, India bought 200 metric tons of gold from the IMF at market rates, increasing its reserves by 50%. Then, just today, Russia announced that it will be shifting reserve ratios in favor of commodity currencies, like the Canadian dollar, and gold.


Far more distressing than the flight of central banks from the paper dollar are recent reports that certain governments, including Germany, Hong Kong, and members of OPEC, are now removing their gold holdings from the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England. If true, these reports could portend the risk of a gold run on the world's two key central banks.


The actions of foreign central banks expose the most confidential views of their top government officials concerning the outlook for the U.S. dollar and the possibility of renewed panic throughout the global financial system.


Once again, I will go on record as saying that counterparty risk is rising, and the safest metal investment is either to take physical delivery or hold title to actual bullion in a stable country. Euro Pacific has long offered the Perth Mint Certificate Program for investors that don't want the cost and risk associated with keeping gold 'under the mattress.' By holding title to gold in Australia instead of America, investors get better legal standing than with an ETF and the added comfort that the regime securing their holdings has among the world's longest track records of stability and brightest growth outlooks for the next decade.

 

I hope - as we all do - that we are being 'too cautious.' But most investors are erring on the side of caution after witnessing half of their wealth disappear overnight. The problem is that investments traditionally considered safe might not be so, as the very assumptions built up over the last thirty years have been upended. During the October '08 crash, many fled into Treasuries and cash. All signs indicate that, in the case of another crash, a repeat of that behavior could wipe out much of our middle class. Those of us who still have doubts about this stimulus-laden 'recovery' are hedging our bets with history's ultimate hedge - gold you can hold.


For a more in-depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar, read Peter Schiff's 2008 bestseller "The Little Book of Bull Moves in Bear Markets" and his newest release "Crash Proof 2.0: How to Profit from the Economic Collapse." Click here to learn more.

 

More importantly, don't let the great deals pass you by. Get an inside view of Peter's playbook with his new Special Report, "Peter Schiff's Five Favorite Investment Choices for the Next Five Years." Click here to download the report for free. You can find more free services for global investors, and learn about the Euro Pacific advantage, at www.europac.net.





Latest Stock Market Reports
World stock markets news summary (US, UK, Europe, Asia) (February 09, 2010)
A hung parliament in Britain looks increasingly likely as the main opposition Conservative’s lead over the ruling Labour Party slips. The Populus polls for the Times newspaper found support for Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s Labour Party up two points from last month at 30%, while the centre-right Conservatives were down one point to 40%. (RTRS) Despite a raft of comments from high-profile speakers such as Jim Rogers, Bill Gross of Pimco and a former chief economist at the IMF – there are number of reasons to believe that the UK won’t end up like Greece. (Telegraph) Firstly, unlike financially distressed members of the Euro, Britain has its own currency. Britain can simply print more money to pay its debts, and arguable has already done so through QE. Obviously, it will be a major blow to Britain’s international standing if it looses its AAA credit rating, but in truth the rating is something of a red herring, and is not the major issue here. The second reason Britain is unlikely to suffer the same fate as Greece, or even Spain, is that the UK has nowhere near the same magnitude of problem. By contrast, UK competitiveness is improving fast, in part because of the flexibility of its labour markets, which has allowed companies to adjust their cost bases quickly by changed circumstances.

Russian stock market daily morning report (February 09, 2010, Tuesday)
The Russian share market began the morning with smooth recovery after the drop of the previous week. However the purchases did not last long and in the afternoon the principal liquid shares were losing 2-4% average. Main reasons of sale were the same – instability of the global economy and worsening of the commodity conjuncture. Investors were actively getting rid of the oil-and-gas and bank sector’s shares. However there were some notes that closed the day positively against the negative background. Polyus Gold and Norilsk Nickel were among the ones that went up due to increased demand of metal.


Indian stock market and companies daily report (February 09, 2010, Tuesday)
The benchmark indices logged marginal gains after swinging sharply in highly volatile trade. IT stocks played the lead role in the recovery; however, metal pivotals remained subdued, as metal prices fell on the LMEX. Telecom stocks advanced on bargain hunting. Rate-sensitive banking shares recovered from the day's low, while auto stocks were mixed. The BSE Sensex and the NSE Nifty rose by a marginal 0.1% each. The BSE Mid-cap and Small-cap indices were down by 0.1% each. Among the front-liners, Bharti Airtel, RCOM, ONGC, HLL and M&M were up by 2-3%, while Tata Steel, Hindalco, Wipro, Jaiprakash Associates and NTPC were down by 1-4%. In the mid-cap segment Chambal Fertilisers, Nagarjuna Fertilisers, Core Projects, Kansai Nerolac, Procter & Gamble were up by 5-7%, while Indraprashtha Gas, Gujarat NRE Coke, Torrent Pharma, Spice Communications and REI Agro, were down by 4-9%


Stocks Recommendations
Godrej Properties IPO review and analysis by Angel Broking, 9 December 2009
Godrej Properties Limited (GPL) intends to develop its projects through joint development agreements with land owners. Under this asset-light model, GPL will enter into revenue, profit or area-sharing agreements with land owners, instead of an outright purchase of the land. This model avoids direct land dealings for GPL and the locking-up of extensive capital in land. Around 80% of GPL's existing land bank will be executed through joint developments with partners. The Godrej brand name has been associated with quality and strong corporate governance. Both of its existing listed entities, Godrej Consumer Products and Godrej Industries have given CAGR Returns of 48% and 77%, respectively, to investors since 2001. We believe that GPL could leverage its parentage brand (with respect to access to the land at Vikhroli and a strong customer preference towards it), assuring a timely delivery of execution. More than 50% of GPL's existing land bank is exposed towards township projects and in one location (Ahmedabad), which will be executed over the next ten years. Any delay in this execution or a fall in property prices in Ahmedabad will impact our NAV estimates, as 50% of our NAV is derived from this project.

JSW Energy Ltd IPO review and analysis by Nirmal Bang, 8 December 2009
JSW Energy Ltd. (JSWEL) is a power project development company, which is developing, and will operate and maintain, power projects in India. The company has two thermal power projects under operation, with a combined installed capacity of 860 MW. JSWEL is a part of the JSW Group, a leading business group in India. JSW Group has a presence in high growth sector like Steel, Energy, Aluminium, Cement, Infrastructure and Logistics. Post IPO holding of Promoter and Promoter Group would be 78.12%

JSW Energy IPO review and analysis by Angel Broking, 7 December 2009
JSW Energy (JSWEL) currently has operational capacity of 995MW and is in the process of executing projects with capacity of 2,655MW. In addition, the company has 7,740MW power generation projects at an early stage of development. A major portion (2,145MW) of JSWEL’s upcoming capacities is expected to be operational by FY2011E thereby providing near-term visibility. Out of the plants under construction, the company expects to commission 570MW by end FY2010E, while another 1,575MW is expected to get operational in FY2011E. Thus, a robust portfolio and near-term Revenue visibility is a major positive for the company.

Surgutneftegas: Currency rates are putting away the dividends..., 26 November 2009
We have revised our model of Surgutneftegas. The reason for that was the output of the 3Q 2009 report, correction of our suppositions of the company’s future development, and also the postponing of the target time and evaluation one year forward. Particularly, in our model of Surgutneftegas we have corrected the former forecast of income for the current year towards reduction: on EBIT – by 2.2%, on the net profit – by 21.5%. Mainly that happened due to the corrections on the operating estimates, and also due to the continuing strengthening of Russian ruble, which, considering significant dollar liquidity of the company, turns into negative currency exchange. Due to the negative currency exchange precisely For the second quarter in a row Surgutneftegas shows low level of the net profit. The fourth quarter, as we see it, will not make an exception and we expect negative currency exchange similar to the ones in the third quarter.

Gazprom: Having passed the bottom, 23 November 2009
We have revised our estimation of Gazprom’s shares. The reason for up-dating the company’s model was the report by IAS for 1H 2009, the budget draft for the next year and corrections of WACC method calculation. The provided financial report of the gas monopoly totally brought no surprises. As it has been expected, the second quarter was worse than the first one and likely was the weakest within the whole year. In 1H 2009 the financial estimates were affected by the decline of the gas sale at all markets by 22.3% average, and by the reduction of the retail price of gas by 9.6% in the state of the far abroad and by 24% in Russia. As a result within the six months of the year 2009 sales slipped by 24.1 bn USD or by 32.8% and formed 49.285 bn USD, operating profit and EBITDA showed reduction by 56.7% and 52.6% respectively and formed 12.98 bn USD and 16.18 bn USD.

Cox and Kings IPO review, analysis and recommendation, 18 November 2009
Cox and Kings proposes to make its IPO in the price band of Rs316-330/share, at a face value of Rs10 each, and to issue 1.85cr shares, of which 30.5lakh shares are offered for sale by Lehman Brothers Opportunity, Deutsche Securities Mauritius and Merrill Lynch Capital Markets Espana. Therefore, the fresh issue by the company will be to the extent of 1.55cr shares. The company plans to use the proceeds for debt repayment (Rs129.6cr), acquisitions and other strategic initiatives  (Rs150cr), investment in overseas subsidiaries (Rs62.5cr), and investment in corporate offices and upgrading its existing operations (Rs60cr).

News
Victoria Oil & Gas, Mediterranean Oil & Gas, Max Petroleum, Atlantic Coal, Red Rock Resources, European Nickel news briefs, 9 February 2010

Heritage Oil, Independent Resources, Xcite Energy, Petrolatina, Greystar Resources, Obtala Resources news briefs, 8 February 2010

Heritage Oil, Independent Resources, Xcite Energy, Petrolatina, Greystar Resources, Obtala Resources news briefs, 8 February 2010

Chinas march to prosperity, 8 February 2010

OSIM Posts Steady FY09 Amidst Turbulence, 7 February 2010



Stock Market News: All News | USA News | Indian News | China News
Stock Market Reports: All Stock Reports | USA Stock Market Reports | Indian Stock Market Reports | China Stock Market Reports | Russian Stock Market Reports
Stocks Price Targets: All Stocks | USA Stocks | UK Stocks | Indian Stocks | China Stocks | Russian Stocks
Companies List: All Companies | Dow Jones 30 Companies | S&P 500 Companies | FTSE 100 Companies | DAX 30 Companies | CAC 40 Companies
Archives: Market Reports | News, Analysis & Researches | Price Targets & Recommendations | Commodities | Forex | Global Outlook

About Us | Privacy Policy | Contacts | Links